Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

China’s consistent stand on Pakistan made India’s ‘diplomatic victory’ at BRICS momentary

China-Pakistan relations remain strong and continue to grow.

Published

on

747 Views

Even before the Indian establishment and the media stopped their celebrations over the BRICS declaration in Xiamen in China earlier this month condemning terrorist groups, including those based in Pakistan, hoping that this could be the game-changer moment in Islamabad-Beijing relations, the Chinese made a U-turn by openly defending their all-weather ally. In fact, China’s stand that Pakistan has made “great sacrifices” in its fight against terror is a repetition of what it had said at the BRICS summit in Goa in India in October last year.

On that occasion, China had uttered the same sympathising words for Pakistan after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had tried to outmanoeuvre Islamabad at the BRICS summit, calling it the “mothership of terrorism”. There has been very little difference between China’s stands on Pakistan in 2016 and 2017 though this year, Beijing has played the game with more caution and diplomacy. And it has done so not without a reason.

International affairs saw significant developments between 2016 and 2017 BRICS summits

Between the two BRICS summits of October 2016 and September 2017, world politics has seen significant changes. The United States has seen a unique president in Donald Trump whose foreign policy priorities have been more than incoherent. The man had first expressed intentions of not continuing with an interfering foreign policy but gradually proved his incapacity to effect a real change on the ground.

Trump’s policy on Afghanistan has been particularly baffling, especially for Pakistan, as Washington had traditionally banked on Islamabad to exercise its influence on matters related to the war-torn country, both during and after the Cold War. This development has created a fair possibility of Pakistan joining China’s orbit and Beijing certainly cannot let go this strategic victory. The other big development which has happened between October 2016 and September 2017 is China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

This connectivity project is not just about China’s gaining geopolitical advantages but also a major step towards facilitating its world ambition. The ‘retreat’ of the US around the same time has created a vacuum in international politics and the Xi Jinping leadership is fully aware of its implications.

There is little chance of seeing China hating Pakistan

Against this backdrop, it is futile to expect that China would start hating Pakistan. The Xiamen declaration condemning terrorism was a strategic move. Through it, Beijing not only showed to the world that like any responsible global power, it also detests terrorism and that also it considers terror as a prime threat to its BRI plan as it would touch several regions of the world that are affected by the extremism. Nationalist elements in India picked only a part of the story thinking China has finally aligned itself with its voice but the Xiamen declaration served China’s own vision and it was just that the terrorist angle had overlapped.

With Afghanistan becoming a key country on China’s radar, Beijing’s love for Pakistan will only become stronger. Despite its engagement with the North Korean problem, China has put considerable focus on Afghanistan and also urged Kabul and Islamabad to work together on improving things.

This is a key requirement for the success of China’s Western and Central Asian plans since Afghanistan is a crucial link between the two regions and Beijing will want it to be peaceful and stable to facilitate its own global ambition. China already has two mechanisms like the QCG (Quadrilateral Coordination Group) comprising China, US, Pakistan and Afghanistan and QCCM (Quadrilateral Cooperation and Coordination Mechanism) featuring China, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Tajikistan focussed on Afghanistan and although the QCG has not yet delivered success, the QCCM has been seen as a key counter-terrorism mechanism to deal with the Afghan terror problem.

China has been wiser than the US in not allowing Pakistan’s decline in its quest for neutralising the terror elements in Afghanistan and the Trump administration’s increasingly tough stance taken vis-à-vis Pakistan is making it convenient for China to deepen its bonds with Islamabad. For Indian policy-makers, this is not something desirable.

For China, Pakistan constitutes a cornerstone of its foreign policy. It counters India’s quest to demean a Pakistan-based terrorist internationally not because it has sympathy for terrorist but simply because it wants to keep India under check. At bilateral levels, China doesn’t forget to remind Pakistan about the justification of safeguarding terrorists, something Pakistan’s Dawn had reported in October last year.

That’s how China conducts itself. It’s only concerned about its own national interests and under Jinping’s leadership, its quest for a global stature has made this pursuit of national interests all the more intense. For India, it will be more important to study the pattern of China’s behaviour vis-à-vis other global and regional powers than to celebrate momentarily.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Abi Shah
Guest
Abi Shah

Modi who is a right wing zionist collaborator clearly thought he had Pakistan by the short and curlies but does this idiot not understand that China and Pakistan have decades of friendship and this strategic alliance will never ever waiver as both nations clearly understand India is not to be trusted knowing how close they are in causing false flag ops within Pakistan.
INDIA got debunked..lmao

VeeNarian (Yerevan)
Guest
VeeNarian (Yerevan)

What EXACTLY does India achieve by getting anyone to declare Pakistan a “terrorist failed state”? Are more roads and railways built? Is more grain grown to feed the billions? Does the cricket team play any better (they got truly thrashed by Pakistan this year)? This type of tantrum is so typical of the blinkered Indian elite. For India to become a true superpower it is time for it to settle the Pakistan problem. No more tantrums at the UN or BRICS. Sit down with Pakistan and complete the partition of India by finally dividing Kashmir. Or are only the Imperial… Read more »

Jets
Guest
Jets

Just a couple of weeks ago, I saw one of many documentaries on the British Bullsh**t Channel, and it was for once like the BBC which I used to know. There were two young journalists who wanted to know more about the partition. If I’m not mistaken it was about 40 + years ago, that my dad (a non-practicing Hindu and a practical man) and a friend (a Muslim) sat together somewhere and the friend said to my dad: “You know, what the hell are we fighting about? We are all brothers after all”. My dad agreed with him. Too… Read more »

pogohere
Guest

Where’s the editor? How did this paragraph survive editing?

“China has been wiser than the US in not allowing Pakistan’s decline in its quest for neutralising the terror elements in Afghanistan and the Trump administration’s increasingly tough stance taken vis-à-vis Pakistan is making it convenient for China to deepen its bonds with Islamabad. For Indian policy-makers, this is not something desirable.”

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Yeah, India, hehe, I fully agrees with our corespondent from Yerevan. I will soon get an report from India, thru family, from an full blown Indian wedding. You know, with an “million” guests. I envies them the trip. And the remedy to help the stupid shitbag Modi I recommend something physical, since I am an non violent man, but have problems with my own morale when it comes to state leaders, whom acts like idiots, and talks like an idiot, when He knows its idiocy, they still play the Yankike pipe and continues to act and talk like idiots, I… Read more »

Latest

US media suffers panic attack after Mueller fails to deliver on much-anticipated Trump indictment

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT


Important pundits and news networks have served up an impressive display of denials, evasions and on-air strokes after learning that Robert Mueller has ended his probe without issuing a single collusion-related indictment.

The Special Counsel delivered his final report to Attorney General William Barr for review on Friday, with the Justice Department confirming that there will be no further indictments related to the probe. The news dealt a devastating blow to the sensational prophesies of journalists, analysts and entire news networks, who for nearly two years reported ad nauseam that President Donald Trump and his inner circle were just days away from being carted off to prison for conspiring with the Kremlin to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Showing true integrity, journalists and television anchors took to Twitter and the airwaves on Friday night to acknowledge that the media severely misreported Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, as well as what Mueller’s probe was likely to find. They are, after all, true professionals.

“How could they let Trump off the hook?” an inconsolable Chris Matthews asked NBC reporter Ken Dilanian during a segment on CNN’s ‘Hardball’.

Dilanian tried to comfort the CNN host with some of his signature NBC punditry.

“My only conclusion is that the president transmitted to Mueller that he would take the Fifth. He would never talk to him and therefore, Mueller decided it wasn’t worth the subpoena fight,” he expertly mused.

Actually, there were several Serious Journalists who used their unsurpassed analytical abilities to conjure up a reason why Mueller didn’t throw the book at Trump, even though the president is clearly a Putin puppet.

“It’s certainly possible that Trump may emerge from this better than many anticipated. However! Consensus has been that Mueller would follow DOJ rules and not indict a sitting president. I.e. it’s also possible his report could be very bad for Trump, despite ‘no more indictments,'” concluded Mark Follman, national affairs editor at Mother Jones, who presumably, and very sadly, was not being facetious.

Revered news organs were quick to artfully modify their expectations regarding Mueller’s findings.

“What is collusion and why is Robert Mueller unlikely to mention it in his report on Trump and Russia?” a Newsweek headline asked following Friday’s tragic announcement.

Three months earlier, Newsweek had meticulously documented all the terrible “collusion” committed by Donald Trump and his inner circle.

But perhaps the most sobering reactions to the no-indictment news came from those who seemed completely unfazed by the fact that Mueller’s investigation, aimed at uncovering a criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin, ended without digging up a single case of “collusion.”

The denials, evasions and bizarre hot takes are made even more poignant by the fact that just days ago, there was still serious talk about Trump’s entire family being hauled off to prison.

“You can’t blame MSNBC viewers for being confused. They largely kept dissenters from their Trump/Russia spy tale off the air for 2 years. As recently as 2 weeks ago, they had @JohnBrennan strongly suggesting Mueller would indict Trump family members on collusion as his last act,” journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted.

While the Mueller report has yet to be released to the public, the lack of indictments makes it clear that whatever was found, nothing came close to the vast criminal conspiracy alleged by virtually the entire American media establishment.

“You have been lied to for 2 years by the MSM. No Russian collusion by Trump or anyone else. Who lied? Head of the CIA, NSA,FBI,DOJ, every pundit every anchor. All lies,” wrote conservative activist Chuck Woolery.

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom was more blunt, but said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Canadian Lawmaker Accuses Trudeau Of Being A “Fake Feminist” (Video)

Rempel segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career

Published

on

Via Zerohedge

Canada’s feminist-in-chief Justin Trudeau wants to support and empower women…but his support stops at the point where said women start creating problems for his political agenda.

That was the criticism levied against the prime minister on Friday by a conservative lawmaker, who took the PM to task for “muzzling strong, principled women” during a debate in the House of Commons.

“He asked for strong women, and this is what they look like!” said conservative MP Michelle Rempel, referring to the former justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, who has accused Trudeau and his cronies of pushing her out of the cabinet after she refused to grant a deferred prosecution agreement to a Quebec-based engineering firm.

She then accused Trudeau of being a “fake feminist”.

“That’s not what a feminist looks like…Every day that he refuses to allow the attorney general to testify and tell her story is another day he’s a fake feminist!”

Trudeau was so taken aback by Rempel’s tirade, that he apparently forgot which language he should respond in.

But Rempel wasn’t finished. She then segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career. This from a man who once objected to the continued use of the word “mankind” (suggesting we use “peoplekind” instead).

The conservative opposition then tried to summon Wilson-Raybould to appear before the Commons for another hearing (during her last appearance, she shared her account of how the PM and employees in the PM’s office and privy council barraged her with demands that she quash the government’s pursuit of SNC-Lavalin over charges that the firm bribed Libyan government officials). Wilson-Raybould left the Trudeau cabinet after she was abruptly moved to a different ministerial post – a move that was widely seen as a demotion.

Trudeau has acknowledged that he put in a good word on the firm’s behalf with Wilson-Raybould, but insists that he always maintained the final decision on the case was hers and hers alone.

Fortunately for Canadians who agree with Rempel, it’s very possible that Trudeau – who has so far resisted calls to resign – won’t be in power much longer, as the scandal has cost Trudeau’s liberals the lead in the polls for the October election.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Why Joe May be Courting Stacey

Joe Biden has a history on compulsory integration dating back to the 1970s that Sen. Jesse Helms called “enlightened.”

Patrick J. Buchanan

Published

on

Authored by Patrick Buchanan via The Unz Review:


Of 895 slots in the freshman class of Stuyvesant High in New York City, seven were offered this year to black students, down from 10 last year and 13 the year before.

In the freshman class of 803 at The Bronx High School of Science, 12 students are black, down from last year’s 25.

Of 303 students admitted to Staten Island Technical High School, one is African-American.

According to The New York Times, similar patterns of admission apply at the other five most elite high schools in the city.

Whites and Asians are 30 percent of middle school students, but 83 percent of the freshman at Bronx High School of Science, 88 percent at Staten Island Technical and 90 percent at Stuyvesant.

What do these numbers tell us?

They reveal the racial composition of the cohort of scientists and technicians who will lead America in the 21st century. And they tell us which races will not be well represented in that vanguard.

They identify a fault line that runs through the Democratic Party, separating leftists who believe in equality of results for all races and ethnic groups, and those who believe in a meritocracy.

Mayor Bill de Blasio has expressed anger and frustration at the under-representation of blacks and Hispanics in the elite schools. But Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state legislature have ignored his pleas to change the way students are admitted.

Currently, the same test, of English and math, is given to middle school applicants. And admission to the elite eight is offered to those who get the highest scores.

Moreover, Asians, not whites, are predominant.

Though 15 percent of all middle school students, Asians make up two-thirds of the student body at Stuyvesant, with 80 times as many slots as their African-American classmates.

The egalitarian wing of the Democratic Party sees this as inherently unjust. And what gives this issue national import are these factors:

First, the recent scandal where rich parents paid huge bribes to criminal consultants to get their kids into elite colleges, by falsifying records of athletic achievement and cheating on Scholastic Aptitude Tests, has caused a wave of populist resentment.

Second, Harvard is being sued for systemic reverse racism, as black and Hispanic students are admitted with test scores hundreds of points below those that would disqualify Asians and whites.

Third, Joe Biden has a history on compulsory integration dating back to the 1970s that Sen. Jesse Helms called “enlightened.”

Here are Biden’s quotes, unearthed by The Washington Post, that reflect his beliefs about forced busing for racial balance in public schools:

“The new integration plans being offered are really just quota systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with.

“What it says is, ‘In order for your child with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son.’ That’s racist!

“Who the hell do we think we are, that the only way a black man or woman can learn is if they rub shoulders with my white child?

“I am philosophically opposed to quota systems. They insure mediocrity.”

That was 44 years ago. While those views were the thinking of many Democrats, and perhaps of most Americans, in the mid-’70s, they will be problematic in the 2020 primaries, where African-Americans could be decisive in the contests that follow Iowa and New Hampshire.

Biden knows that just as Bernie Sanders, another white male, fell short in crucial South Carolina because of a lack of support among black voters, he, too, has a problem with that most loyal element in the Democratic coalition.

In 1991, Biden failed to rise to the defense of Anita Hill when she charged future Justice Clarence Thomas with sexual harassment. In the Senate Judiciary Committee, he was a law-and-order champion responsible for tough anti-crime legislation that is now regarded as discriminatory.

And he has a record on busing for racial balance that made him a de facto ally of Louise Day Hicks of the Boston busing case fame.

How, with a record like this, does Biden inoculate himself against attacks by rival candidates, especially candidates of color, in his run for the nomination?

One way would be to signal to his party that he has grown, he has changed, and his 2020 running mate will be a person of color. Perhaps he’ll run with a woman of color such as Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost the 2018 governor’s race in Georgia.

An ancillary benefit would be that Abrams on the ticket would help him carry Georgia, a state Donald Trump probably cannot lose and win re-election.

Wrote Axios this morning:

“Close advisers to former Vice President Joe Biden are debating the idea of packaging his presidential campaign announcement with a pledge to choose Stacey Abrams as his vice president.”


Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending