in ,

Can We Coexist with Asia’s Communists?

In America, it has become good politics to be tough on China.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Authored by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org:

The rhetoric out of the North against South Korean President Moon Jae-in, coming from the 32-year-old sister of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, the rising star of the regime, Kim Yo Jong, has been scalding. In a statement this week, Kim Yo Jong derided Moon as a flunky of the Americans…

Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met for seven hours at Hickam Air Force Base in Hawaii with the chief architect of China’s foreign policy, Yang Jiechi.

The two had much to talk about.

As The Washington Post reports, the “bitterly contentious relationship” between our two countries has “reached the lowest point in almost half a century.” Not since Nixon went to China have relations been so bad.

Early this week, Chinese and Indian soldiers fought with rocks, sticks and clubs along the Himalayan truce line that dates back to their 1962 war. Twenty Indian soldiers died, some pushed over a cliff into a freezing river in the highest-casualty battle between the Asian giants in decades.

Among the issues surely raised with Pompeo by the Chinese is the growing bipartisan vilification of China and its ruling Communist Party by U.S. politicians the closer we come to November.

The U.S. has been putting China in the dock for concealing information on the coronavirus virus until it had spread, lying about it, and then letting Wuhan residents travel to the outside world while quarantining them inside China.

In America, it has become good politics to be tough on China.

The reasons are many.

High among them are the huge trade deficits with China that led to an historic deindustrialization of America, China’s emergence as the world’s first industrial power, and a U.S. dependency on Chinese imports for the vital necessities of our national life.

Then there is the systematic theft of intellectual property from U.S. companies in China and Beijing’s deployment of thousands of student-spies into U.S. colleges and universities to steal security secrets.

Then there is the suppression of Christianity, the denial of rights to the people of Tibet and the discovery of an archipelago of concentration camps in western China to “reeducate” Muslim Uighurs and Kazakhs to turn them into more loyal and obedient subjects.

Among the strategic concerns of Pompeo: China’s fortification of islets, rocks and reefs in the South China Sea and use of its warships to drive Vietnamese, Malaysian, Indonesian and Philippine fishing vessels out of their own territorial waters that China now claims.

Another worry for Pompeo: China’s buildup of medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, a nuclear arsenal not contained or covered by the Cold War arms agreements between Russia and the United States.

Then there were those provocative voyages by a Chinese aircraft carrier through the Taiwan Strait to intimidate Taipei and show Beijing’s hostility toward the recently reelected pro-U.S. government on the island.

Finally, there are China’s growing restrictions on the freedoms the people of Hong Kong have enjoyed under the Basic Law negotiated with the United Kingdom when the territory was ceded back to Beijing in 1997.

Also on the menu at Hickam was almost surely the new bellicosity out of Pyongyang. This week, the building in Kaesong, just inside North Korea, where bilateral peace talks have been held between the two Koreas, was blown up by the North. With the explosion came threats from the North to send combat troops back into positions they had vacated along the DMZ.

The rhetoric out of the North against South Korean President Moon Jae-in, coming from the 32-year-old sister of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, the rising star of the regime, Kim Yo Jong, has been scalding.

In a statement this week, Kim Yo Jong derided Moon as a flunky of the Americans: “It is our fixed judgment that it is no longer possible to discuss the North-South ties with such a servile partner engaging only in disgrace and self-ruin, being soaked by deep-rooted flunkyism.”

North Korea’s state media published photos of the destruction of the joint liaison office. Pyongyang is shutting off communications with Seoul, and a frustrated South looks to be ginning up and reciprocating.

The North-South detente appears dead, and President Trump’s special relationship with Kim Jong Un may not be far behind.

There are rumors of a renewal of nuclear weapons and long-range missile tests by the North, suspension of which was one of the diplomatic achievements of Trump.

Whether Trump’s cherished trade deal with China can survive the growing iciness between the two nations remains to be seen.

What the Chinese seem to be saying with their actions — against India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Australia, Hong Kong and Japan — is this: Your American friends and allies are yesterday. We are tomorrow. The future of Asia belongs to us. Deal with it!

No one should want a hot war, or a new cold war, with China or North Korea.

But if Trump was relying on his special relationships with Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping, his trade deal with China and his commitment by Kim to give up nuclear weapons for recognition, trade and aid, he will have to think again.

For the foreseeable future, Communist bellicosity out of Beijing and Pyongyang seem in the cards, if not worse.


Do You Appreciate Reading Our Emails and Website? Let us know how we are doing – Send us a Thank You Via Paypal!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack Garbo
Jack Garbo
June 20, 2020

Pat lost his dementia pills awhile back. The only avowed Communists left in Asia are little, landlocked Laos and the Indian state of Kerala. The rest are a mix of Capitalist/Socialist economies (except DPRK, a state Capitalist economy). The US continues down its Fascist/Totalitarian slope into chaos and disintegration, like drunken passengers on the Titanic complaining about lack of ice in their drinks. They’ll soon all they want.

Haeul
Haeul
Reply to  Jack Garbo
June 20, 2020

Precisely! The only thing about China that’s communist is the name of its party, which the Chinese view as a most effective alternative to the corrupt two-party and multi-party systems we have in the West. I am an ardent anti-communist, but one cannot deny all that the centralisation CPC facilitates has achieved in China. Why, then, should I have an issue with the CPC, which benefits its own people, and doesn’t try to imposed its (barely communist brand of) communism on the rest of us? I wouldn’t even have an issue with Saudi Arabia, if it wasn’t trying to export… Read more »

BobValdez
BobValdez
Reply to  Haeul
June 21, 2020

Well said.

BobValdez
BobValdez
Reply to  Jack Garbo
June 21, 2020

Thank you. I was about to write the same, but you beat me to it.

John Doran
John Doran
Reply to  Jack Garbo
June 21, 2020

Have to agree Jack.
 
Communism, Capitalism (which has now morphed into Fascism) & Democracy are all now dominated by the banksters.
1956 Book by WWII Canadian naval intelligence officer William Guy Carr:
Pawns In The Game.
 
Rothschild + 12 pals 1773 plot for global domination is in chapter 3.
Banksters’ $50,000,000 funding for the Bolshevik revolution in the middle of WWI is in chapter 9.
 
Can be read free online using the search box at
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net
 
John Doran.

Haeul
Haeul
June 20, 2020

We can coexist with all those who do not try to impose their system, there beliefs, their values, their norms, and their will upon us. China is no way, shape or form doing anything of the sort. It is the neo-liberal and Muslim extremists who are.

Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
June 20, 2020

How about being tough on US world-wide misbehaviour??? Sadly amusing how the US always fails to point an accusing finger at itself. Actually…not amusing, damn sad.

St. Longinus
St. Longinus
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
June 20, 2020

How about being tough on diaspora world-wide misbehaviour??? Sadly amusing how the diaspora always fails to point an accusing finger at itself. Actually…not amusing, damn sad.
 
There, fixed it for you.

BobValdez
BobValdez
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
June 21, 2020

Agreed.

Che
Che
June 25, 2020

Pat shows his true Uniparty, military industrial intel credentials to pronounce thus;
“Hope? Forget it! Policy change? Impossible! Outsider bringing new ideas? Sure but won’t work!”
 
Pat tells us to go back in time pretend now never happened. Pat is at least partially responsible for all the swamp fraud and corruption we are currently becoming aware of that has captured the US establishment for 40 years. I never heard Pat calling out fraud as fraud.

What The Hell IS Globalization Exactly ? Thorsten Polleit Explains

Why Changing CHAZ to CHOP Is Actually a Very Big Deal