Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

Can India see in Gujarat what US witnessed in Alabama?

In a momentous turnaround in Alabama where a Republican lost after decades of sustained victories, America saw where the power of democracy lies. Can something similar happen in Gujarat, the state of Indian PM Narendra Modi on December 18? 

Published

on

6,608 Views

The political narratives in two of the world’s most prominent democracies – India and the United States have unfolded in a similar form. In both countries, a right-wing majoritarian populism has taken deep roots and the implication of such leaderships in the respective nations’ social life has been found to be serious. Be it the India of Prime Minister Narendra Modi or the US of President Donald Trump, the idea of democracy as an arrangement to promote a universally free will has been overshadowed to a point of deep worry. For the common citizens of both these democracies who believe in a universal dignity of human life, the noisy progress of things under both Modi and Trump has been disturbing, to say the least. The continuous attacks on human life and the decorum that is associated with it in these two extremely populist regimes have left many with the desire to see a backlash at some point of time.

The outcome of Alabama’s senatorial race in the US was perhaps a divine response to that call. The defeat of the controversial former judge Roy Moore who has been accused by a several women of sexual misconduct in his younger days is being seen as a blow to Trump himself for her had ignored warnings from his own party men to back the former in the election. Moore’s loss against Doug Jones meant a Democrat candidate has won from Alabama, a state known to be a Republican stronghold, for the first time in 25 years.

For those who see the Trump era as an endless nightmare in the history of the US, this is a welcome change ahead of the crucial midterm elections in 2018. The mainstream media, which has been seeking an opportunity to launch an attack on Trump since his victory in the presidential elections last year, has already forecast that he result in Alabama would shake Washington in the near future. After the morale boosting victories in governor’s races in Virginia and New Jersey last month, the result in Alabama is certainly going to give the Democrats a much-needed moral boost.

Gujarat election in India has a close parallel with Alabama poll

Drawing a close parallel with Alabama, the result of the crucial election in the Indian state of Gujarat to be declared on December 18 is also key for Prime Minister Modi. This election is a prestige battle for the premier for Gujarat is his own state and in the wake of his government’s controversial measures like demonetisation and goods and services tax and the rising instances of attacks on minorities and lower sections of the society in the name of cow protection and resisting ‘love jihad’, the ruling BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party or Indian People’s Party) is not as confident as it looks otherwise. There are basic differences between the American and Indian models of democracy – the former is more individual-centric while the latter’s party-centric – but in essence, both are witnessing a similar churning.

If the BJP faces an adversity in the Gujarat elections (even a reduction in its tally of seats if not a defeat will be considered a blow for Modi ahead of the 2019 national elections), then those voices that are finding themselves buried under a pile of majoritarian sentiments at the moment will get a reason to feel vindicated. If Gujarat’s electorate decides to go Alabama’s way, then the democracy in India will also find an opportunity to rediscover it by breaking the monotony of the Hindutva majoritarianism.

A lot at stake: Both for Trump and Modi

Just like Trump who backed Moore because in the latter, he had found a like-minded soul (though he distanced himself from the man after the results came out saying he knew it beforehand, highlighting again his narcissist being once again!), Modi also chose to dump the rhetoric of development during the highly charged campaigning for the Gujarat polls. This is a departure from the past when the man emphasised on the development card over everything else to attract the electorate.

In a state which is being ruled by this party for over two decades now and of which he was the chief minister for over 12 years, Modi’s strategy to ignore development and make polarisation the central argument has turned several analysts off.

The prime minister has been seen building a narrative linking the Opposition Congress-Muslim-Pakistan to cater to the majoritarian sentiments and it was considered by many observers as a new low of Indian politics. Modi even accused his predecessor Manmohan Singh of colluding with Pakistani guests at a dinner party, a gesture which had left the Opposition as well as a section of the media fuming.

Just as Trump had invited the voters of Alabama to choose Moore saying the “future of the country” was at stake, Modi’s campaigning over the Gujarat election also say how much significance it holds for him and his party. A setback in Gujarat can also affect all the good work Modi’s general Amit Shah, the BJP president, has been doing over the past few years, just like Steven Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, who was hit by Moore’s loss.

As the Trump-Moore combination helped the Democrats by cobbling up the black, women and youth votes in favour of Jones, the Patidar agitation and the coming together of Opposition leaders like Rahul Gandhi and young caste/community leaders like Hardik Patel, Jignesh Mevani and Alpesh Thakor has similarly put the BJP under pressure in the Gujarat election this year.

A loss can see BJP implode, just like the GOP

There is also a similarity in the situations of the Republican Party and the BJP. While Moore’s loss is bound to have a serious repercussion for the GOP even worsening the civil war within it, a not-so-happy outcome in the Gujarat poll can also put the BJP’s house in disarray. The party certainly has not been a united outfit since Modi’s elevation took place and any less-than-expected result in the prime minister’s state can have a shocking impact.

Gujarat, thus, has all the potential to become India’s own Alabama. And if an Alabama-like story is repeated there, then democracy will be credited for producing the magic of fooling its hijackers – yet again.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Latest

Putin, Trump meet in Helsinki for first bilateral summit

The Helsinki summit is the first ever full-fledged meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. Their previous encounters were brief talks on the sidelines of the G20 and APEC summits in 2017.

Vladimir Rodzianko

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump are meeting in the Finnish capital of Helsinki for their first bilateral one-on-one meeting.

Trump arrived in the Finland capital a day early, while the jet of Putin, who wrapped up his nation’s hosting of the World Cup Sunday, touched down around 1 p.m. local time and the Russian president’s motorcade whisked him straight to the palace where the two world leaders are meeting.

Trump signed an August 2017 law imposing additional sanctions on Russia. The law bars Trump from easing many sanctions without Congress’ approval, but he can offer some relief without a nod from Congress.

Almost 700 Russian people and companies are under U.S. sanctions. Individuals face limits on their travel and freezes on at least some of their assets, while some top Russian state banks and companies, including oil and gas giants, are effectively barred from getting financing through U.S. banks and markets.

The agenda of the summit hasn’t been officially announced yet, though, the presidents are expected to discuss global crises, such as the Syrian conflict and Ukraine, as well as bilateral relations.

Stay tuned for updates…

Continue Reading

Latest

“Foreign entity, NOT RUSSIA” hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails (Video)

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tx): Hillary Clinton’s cache of 30,000 emails was hacked by foreign actor, and it was not Russia.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

A stunning revelation that hardly anyone in the mainstream media is covering.

Fox News gave Louie Gohmert (R-Tx) the opportunity to explain what was going on during his questioning of Peter Strzok, when the the Texas Congressman stated that a “foreign entity, NOT RUSSIA” hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Aside from this segment on Fox News, this story is not getting any coverage, and we know why. It destroys the entire ‘Russia hacked Hillary’ narrative.

Gohmert states that this evidence is irrefutable and shows that a foreign actor, not connected to Russia in any way, intercepted and distributed Hillary Clinton’s cache of 30,000 emails.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Via Zerohedge

As we sift through the ashes of Thursday’s dumpster-fire Congressional hearing with still employed FBI agent Peter Strzok, Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller plucked out a key exchange between Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tx) and Strzok which revealed a yet-unknown bombshell about the Clinton email case.

Nearly all of Hillary Clinton’s emails on her homebrew server went to a foreign entity that isn’t Russia. When this was discovered by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), IG Chuck McCullough sent his investigator Frank Ruckner and an attorney to notify Strzok along with three other people about the “anomaly.”

Four separate attempts were also made to notify DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to brief him on the massive security breach, however Horowitz “never returned the call.” Recall that Horowitz concluded last month that despite Strzok’s extreme bias towards Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump – none of it translated to Strzok’s work at the FBI.

In other words; Strzok, while investigating Clinton’s email server, completely ignored the fact that most of Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity – while IG Horowitz simply didn’t want to know about it.

Daily Caller reports…

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

Gohmert continued..

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia.”

Strzok admitted to meeting with Ruckner but said he couldn’t remember the “specific” content of their discussion.

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

According to Zerohedge “Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call,” Gohmert said – and Horowitz wouldn’t return the call.

And while Peter Strzok couldn’t remember the specifics of his meeting with the IG about the giant “foreign entity” bombshell, he texted this to his mistress Lisa Page when the IG discovered the “(C)” classification on several of Clinton’s emails – something the FBI overlooked:

“Holy cow … if the FBI missed this, what else was missed? … Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this.”

Via Zerohedge

In November of 2017, IG McCullough – an Obama appointee – revealed to Fox News that he received pushback when he tried to tell former DNI James Clapper about the foreign entity which had Clinton’s emails and other anomalies.

Instead of being embraced for trying to expose an illegal act, seven senators including Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca) wrote a letter accusing him of politicizing the issue.

“It’s absolutely irrelevant whether something is marked classified, it is the character of the information,” he said. Fox News reports…

McCullough said that from that point forward, he received only criticism and an “adversarial posture” from Congress when he tried to rectify the situation.

“I expected to be embraced and protected,” he said, adding that a Hill staffer “chided” him for failing to consider the “political consequences” of the information he was blowing the whistle on.

Continue Reading

Latest

Donald Trump plays good cop and bad cop with a weak Theresa May (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 55.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK was momentous, not for its substance, but rather for its sheer entertainment value.

Trump started his trip to the United Kingdom blasting Theresa May for her inability to negotiate a proper Brexit deal with the EU.  Trump ended his visit holding hands with the UK Prime Minister during a press conference where the most ‘special relationship’ between the two allies was once again reaffirmed.

Protests saw giant Trump “baby balloons” fly over London’s city center, as Trump played was his own good cop and bad cop to the UK PM, outside London at the Chequers…often times leaving May’s head spinning.

Even as Trump has left London, he remains front and center in the mind of Theresa May, who has now stated that Trump advised her to “sue” the European Union to resolve the tense negotiations over Brexit.

Trump had mentioned to reporters on Friday at a joint press conference with Theresa May that he had given the British leader a suggestion that she found too “brutal.”

Asked Sunday on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show what that suggestion was, May: “He told me I should sue the EU. Not go into negotiation, sue them.” May added…

“What the president also said at that press conference was `Don’t walk away. Don’t walk away from the negotiations. Then you’re stuck.”‘

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris summarize what was a state visit like no other, as Trump trolled the UK PM from beginning to end, and left London knowing that he got the better of a weakened British Prime Minister, who may not survive in office past next week.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Via CNBC

It wasn’t exactly clear what Trump meant. The revelation came after explosive and undiplomatic remarks Trump made this week about May’s leadership — especially her handling of the Brexit negotiations — as he made his first official visit to Britain.

In an interview with The Sun newspaper published Thursday — just as May was hosting Trump at a lavish black-tie dinner — Trump said the British leader’s approach likely “killed” chances of a free-trade deal with the United States. He said he had told May how to conduct Brexit negotiations, “but she didn’t listen to me.”

He also praised May’s rival, Boris Johnson, who quit last week as foreign secretary to protest May’s Brexit plans. Trump claimed Johnson would make a “great prime minister.”

The comments shocked many in Britain — even May’s opponents — and threatened to undermine May’s already fragile hold on power. Her Conservative government is deeply split between supporters of a clean break with the EU and those who want to keep close ties with the bloc, Britain’s biggest trading partner.

Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Advertisement

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement
Advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisements

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!

The Duran Newsletter

Trending