Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

BRICS in talks to create own cryptocurrency in another blow to US Dollar

BRICSCoin could be the world’s newest currency.

Published

on

9,531 Views

The Head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) Kirill Dmitriev has stated that the BRICS may opt to create their own cryptocurrency for the purposes of global commerce.

A cryptocurrency is a digitally based means of exchange wherein the value of said currency is not determined by a central-bank. Most cryptocurrencies can be converted into state-issued currencies (Dollars, Euros, Yuan, etc.) through various foreign exchange services.

Currently, one of the biggest issues facing crypocurrency development is the fact that they are not backed up by any central bank. However, many also see this apparent disadvantage as a possible opportunity, particularly where unilateral Dollar based sanctions are concerned.

While the US Dollar remains the most popular global trading and reserve currency, this is rapidly changing. A BRICS backed cryptocurrency may be both the proverbial ‘Dollar buster’ as well as a ‘sanctions buster’.

In May of this year, China and Russia agreed to begin a process of trade in local currencies. Turkey and Iran have also begun steps to break away from the Dollar.

READ MORE: 5 ways Russia and China are deepening their cooperation

Even more recently, China announced that is plans to allow for oil trading in Yuan which will be convertible to gold at the Shanghai and Hong Kong international gold exchanges.

The creation of a BRICS cryptocurrency could potentially retain the flexibility of current cryptocurrencies with the additional benefit of being backed by the leaders of a large economic-trading union which would give traders confidence in such a currency that many existing cryptos such as Bitcoin are lacking.

It is not certain what the exchange rate of a would-be BRICSCoin would be, but there is every chance that it could be based on a derivative of what is known as Special drawing rights (XDR) a current means of exchange which pools the values of the US Dollar, British Pound, Japanese Yen and the Euro.

A possible variation which would set the initial exchange rates of a BRICSCoin could be a combination of a gold backed Chinese Yuan, Russian Rouble, Indian Rupee, South African Rand and Brazilian Real.

This could create an effective hybrid currency that could easy trade and make exchange rates between BRICS states and their partnership more equitable. There is also a potential for such a currency to be used as a means of everyday exchange among businesses and individuals in growing and emerging markets that seek to partner with the BRICS in the so-called BRICS Plus format.

While cryptocurrencies are relatively easy to create, they are more difficult to promote as a widely accepted means of exchange. However, with the prominent economies of the BRICS backing such a currency, this problem could be easily bypassed, as a semi-central regulatory body would likely be the logical outgrowth of such an initiative.

As Kirill Dmitriev stated during the BRICS summit in Xiamen China,

“Another topic discussed by the financial committee was cryptocurrencies. The creation of BRICS’ cryptocurrency as an alternative to other payment tools might also be discussed.

…cryptocurencies are also being discussed as one of the possible options for financial settlement. For particular payments it might be quite relevant and serve as a good alternative to the dollar or any other currency.

We estimate that the mutual investments of the BRICS countries might see an increase by 3-4 times due to such instruments as BRICS [Development] Bank”.

READ MORE: Russia seeks to break free of Dollar dependence

In many ways, the most powerful asset the US has internationally is the Dollar. If the effective hegemony of the Dollar is broken, it could be a substantial opportunity for emerging markets to assert their monetary and consequentially fiscal independence.

Russia is already taking its own steps towards developing its own cryptocurrency. According to Communications Minister Nikolay Nikiforov, a Russian cryptocurrency will be designed to work with existing Russian technologies rather than the foreign technologies which form the basis of the Bitcorn blockchain.

Nikiforov stated,

“Bitcoin and Etherium are cryptocurrencies developed on the basis of foreign cryptography. Russia has its own cryptography school. I think that we are absolutely capable of creating a cryptographic unit, a tool, based on the blockchain technology, and work out concrete regulations to set the framework for the operations”.

Such a currency could receive an official sanction from the Russian Central Bank. This technology could be used to help develop the BRICS wide crypto which has been widely discussed at the current summit.

The BRICS summit in Xiamen continues through the 5th of September.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Abi Shah
Guest
Abi Shah

The creation of the hegemonic and evil petro dollar needs to be eradicated because this dominance has put the entire globe under their rule and if it was not for Russia and China leading the way towards are more fairer system then I certainly believe Israel would and may and will bring about their new world order by stealing the wealth of other nations as it has been doing for decades such as greece ireland and many of the european nations. I for one would gladly shy away from the Dollar and rebuild a system that provides some kind of… Read more »

Jets
Guest
Jets

Brilliant in every way and every word (especially the last sentence).

TEN thumbs up :-))

Ricardo Silva
Guest
Ricardo Silva

Israel is a great country, as they’re proving now by getting extremely upset at Netanyahu because he wasted some money. They’re even talking about removing him from the job. Wow!

Oddly enough, I never saw this many Israelis getting upset when Netanyahu Mass Murdered innocent civilians. Nor they get upset when they are asked to intentionally murder children and pregnant women. Israelis have no problems committing atrocities. They even celebrate it. Disgusting savages.

bcguy
Guest
bcguy

Great points. i know Russia did kick the rotchild money launderers out and he also paid off the IMF. This new currency backed by a development bank seems like a really good investment.

Abi Shah
Guest
Abi Shah

Thank you sir i truly believe that your certainly a petson of integrity because you r eyes are open to a much more sinister agenda by we know who>>Israeli zionists likud party and the entire puppet us congress.
What we should be appaulled at is when a new president of the united states is inaugurated the 1st mandate he has to sign is to pledge his undeniable allegiances to the zionist state of Israel..so plesse tell me what this really encompasses?

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

I knew there is a very sinister plot at play here “(BRICS)” the big threat to USA, UK, Israel!!!! They need a big war like North Korea to divert attention!!! Too effing bad for the 2 Koreas, but then pawns are just pawns, eh?

Trauma2000
Guest
Trauma2000

I keep reading up on articles that talk about ‘replacing the U.$. hegemonic dollar… blah blah” but I’m yet to read anything significant about the “framework” that is being developed to ‘replace the Reserve Bank’ framework that is controlled by the Rothschilds. Only when the ‘Reserve Bank’ framework ceases to be necessary, will countries be free to regain control their finances. It’s the ‘Reserve Bank Framework’ that keeps entire countries subservient to Rothschild controlled financial markets; not the presence of money per se. And what makes anyone think that the Rothschilds, and their incredible wealth, will not corner the CryptoCurreny… Read more »

Gareth Barnard
Guest
Gareth Barnard

Firstly there are no reserve banks in which any Rothschild has any stake. That’s fake news. Controlling monetary supply is also essential to maintaining it’s value and there is a free market in international currency exchanges.

Ricardo Silva
Guest
Ricardo Silva

Well, if that’s fake news, then… who the hell do all the countries from all over the world … own money to…? To the Aliens? To no one? Then we might as well stop paying.

You know very well that Zionists own and control the Federal Reserve. But why do you deny it? Are you hoping they’ll give you a stake in it, perhaps? Keep dreaming, little marionette.

bluewater
Guest
bluewater

a heads up …from an insider source…..Bitcoin was created by THE NSA and it is owned by ROTHSCHILD IT IS A SCAM and if you can not hold it in your hand..it is worthless..When the INTERNET GOES DOWN..YOU ARE SCREWED and BY LAW…THE NSA can take it away from you ..IT IS LEGAL FOR THEM TO DO IT!!!!! from another very good source…..YOU will not have a FINANCIAL RESET till the CABAL is taken out and they will …then you will have a new currency to use that will be backed up by GOLD.. THE ELITES..JPMORGAN,ROTHSCHILDS have been manipulating GOLD… Read more »

Ricardo Silva
Guest
Ricardo Silva

Stop injecting drugs… they’re bad for you.

jenuty
Guest
jenuty

no sense

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

‘It is not certain what the exchange rate of a would-be BRICSCoin would be, but there is every chance that it could be based on a derivative of what is known as Special drawing rights (XDR) a current means of exchange which pools the values of the US Dollar, British Pound, Japanese Yen and the Euro.’ NO chance whatsoever, I would have thought. The SDR is a tool created by the IMF so, while a SDR backed BRICSCoin might bypass central banks, it falls straight under the influence of the IMF, which ‘controls’ the central banks. ‘A possible variation which… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

Thanks, I’ll take a look. Max Keiser on RT’s Keiser Report has done a full 180 degree turn on gold and bitcoin in the last year or so. He was promoting bitcoin again today and trashing Jim Rickards for focusing on gold. But Max never explained why he changed his mind so radically. Interesting.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

You are welcome and I hope it answers some of your questions. I must say that I personally am not 100% clear of all the implications, but I can only liken it to the US Fed “creating money out of nothing” and seeing the similarities.

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

I agree.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal
Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

Yep, thanks for that last one – just read it and it confirms what I thought and what Peter Schiff says in his podcast. Bitcoin does not pass the test for a currency and it is an as like anything else bought on the stock exchange. I haven’t had a chance to read all the zero hedges you linked yet but I’ve read similar on there before and I note in one of the ones you sent, China says it’s not a currency (was that the one above? Can’t remember, my grandson doesn’t like me concentrating on anything but him… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

I saw that one last week.

What is interesting from the BRICS this year is the idea being solidified re a crypto currency for the BRICS nations and their partners to be able to circumvent sanctions etc! I imagine that that currency would possibly be backed by gold to solidify its worth.

Here is some info on it…it should be interesting to see it develop.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/blow-us-dollar-brics-considers-cryptocurrency/231571/
http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_10_09/What-will-happen-to-global-economy-if-BRICS-announce-launch-of-new-currency-Bricso-1897/

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

Yes, a basket of currencies (their own), along the lines of the IMF SDR idea; backed by gold, which Russia and China have been reputedly accumulating in large quantities, would make sense. India isn’t short of gold either. After the way Russia, China and Brazil have been treated by the international community (I mean the US elite), one can only wish them every economic success. I am still intrigued, though, how Brazil’s Michel Temer fits into the BRICS set up; Dilma Rousseff was impeached and dispatched politically, largely by Temer, who is Washington’s puppet. I can’t imagine the other BRICS… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

I read Temer is up for impeachment too!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/brazil-president-temer-threatened-impeachment-after-new-corruption-scandal-emerges
On BRICS, he seems to be less vocal during the meetings but so far as I have heard he is on board with BRICS goals. This despite the US coup in Brazil it doesnt seem that there is some permanent damage done to the group. Although who knows for sure.

If there is problems on the horizon I think it might come from India, as it seems to be indecisive as to its commitment to BRICS vs the US.

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

Yes, India doesn’t seem to see eye to eye with China.

I thought that was Temer’s daughter standing with him.

With Brazil sliding all over the place, India playing all sides for its own gain and South Africa, which was a late arrival, it would seem that Russia and China are doing all the heavy lifting. Good reason to bring in some of the other Asian countries, I suppose.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

Re South Africa, the US is trying to pull a “regime change” or else there.

As regards bringing in other countries, that is why they set up the BRICS+ and BRICS++. They are certainly not keeping anyone out that wants to work with them! It seems that even Germany is interested!
http://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/re-thinking-the-brics/
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201703221051849196-brics-enlargement-plan/

India is upset because of Pakistan’s being part of the BRICS+
https://sputniknews.com/world/201703111051472250-china-pakistan-brics/

I dont know if you have seen this article re BRICS 2017 by Pepe Escobar, if not its a good read as to what turmoil seems to be going on.
http://www.atimes.com/article/odds-brics-nations-get-act-together/

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

Just read this article…SUPER interesting re India and Brazil as regards BRICS. It also mentions the other countries showing interest in BRICS http://www.atimes.com/article/real-brics-bombshell/

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

I just read this on the US’ SEC and the IMF possibly regulating (taking over) bitcoin. Super interesting and will be interested to see how the crypto currency of BRICS will be set up differently.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-05/global-elites-secret-plan-cryptocurrencies
http://www.zerohedge.com a;ways has a lot of articles on bitcoin (plus a lot of other interesting news)

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

Like a rabid dog at the end of its life, it lashes out & uses any means at it’s disposal to hurt others in order to survive, this is what we see happening before our very eyes. America is on the verge of collapse & it will use any means at it’s disposal to retain the empire. Hence all the Russo-phobia & China bagging. I say the death of this pariah, America cannot come soon enough!!! The world is sick to death of the wars it wages on sovereign soils, responsible for the deaths of millions of innocents in order… Read more »

Gareth Barnard
Guest
Gareth Barnard

Yes Dago. It’s time people like Kim Jong-ug take there rightful place on the stage of world power

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

Oh & the mad men running The Empire of Chaos are better???

Ricardo Silva
Guest
Ricardo Silva

Yep… Divide & Conquer is the plan. The Zionists have been destroying the USA by the inside since 1776… and the endgame is very near. The US will probably end up breaking up into a variety of different countries. United we stand, divided we fall.

Dennis Morrisseau
Guest

DO IT!

Popart 2015
Guest
Popart 2015

Cryptocurrency sounds like avoiding the problem! Why crypto if you can do the real deal?

Kubrickian
Guest
Kubrickian

That would be the currency to buy but like the ones before it you wouldn’t be able to buy it until the currency was inflated beyond what an average investor could afford.

Latest

Venezuela to Iran and Abrams to Pompeo, neocon warmongers had a bad week (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 86.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou take a quick look at neocon foreign policy blunders in Venezuela, and Iran.

Neocon war criminal Elliott Abrams was humiliated and demolished by Rep. Ilhan Omar over his history of illegal Latin American regime change operations. In Poland Vice President Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo were rebuked, as their Iran warmongering conference feel flat to a European audience.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Zerohedge


Rep. Ilhan Omar clashed with newly minted Venezuela Envoy Elliott Abrams during a Wednesday hearing in front of the House Foreign Relations Committee discussing the role of the US military in Central America.

“Mr. Abrams, in 1991 you pleaded guilty to two counts of withholding information from Congress regarding your involvement in the Iran-Contra affair, for which you were later pardoned by president George H.W. Bush,” began Omar. “I fail to understand why members of this committee or the American people should find any testimony that you give today to be truthful.”

“If I could respond to that…” interjected Abrams.

It was not a question,” shot back Omar.

After a brief exchange in which Abrams protested “It was not right!” Omar cut Abrams off, saying “Thank you for your participation.”

Omar: “On February 8, 1982, you testified before the Senate foreign relations committee about US policy in El Salvador. In that hearing you dismissed as communist propaganda, a report about the massacre of El Mozote in which more than 800 civilians – including children as young as two-years old – were brutally murdered by US-trained troops. During that massacre, some of those troops bragged about raping 12-year-old girls before they killed them. You later said that the US policy in El Salvador was a “fabulous achievement.”

“Yes or no – do you still think so?” asked Omar.

Abrams replied: “From, the day that Duarte was elected in a free election, to this day, El Salvador has been a democracy. That’s a fabulous achievement.”

Omar shot back: “Yes or no, do you think that massacre was a fabulous achievement that happened under our watch?”

Abrams protested: “That is a ridiculous question—

to which Omar shot back, “Yes or no,” cutting him off.

“No!” exclaimed Abrams, who added “I am not going to respond to that kind of personal attack – which is not a question.”

Omar pushed back: “Yes or no, would you support an armed faction within Venezuela that engages in war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, if you believe they were serving US interests as you did in Guatemala, El Salvador and Nicaragua?

I am not going to respond to that question, I’m sorry. I don’t think this entire line of questioning is meant to be real questions, and so I will not reply.” said Abrams.

Watch:

As Joseph Duggan of American Greatness noted two weeks ago;

Abrams is the pre-eminent prophet and practitioner of hyper-interventionist approaches to destabilize or overthrow governments – of foes and friends alike – that do not pass his democracy-is-the-end-all-and-be-all litmus test. His closest friends and associates, from whom his political positions are indistinguishable, include some of President Trump’s most rabid enemies, false-flag “conservatives” Bill Kristol and Max Boot.

Abrams, who had served in the Reagan State Department, faced multiple felony charges for lying to Congress and defying U.S. law in his role as a mastermind of the Iran-Contra debacle.Abrams’ dishonesty almost destroyed Ronald Reagan’s presidency and put Reagan in jeopardy of impeachment. Abrams was allowed to plead guilty to two reduced charges and later was pardoned by George H.W. Bush, who feared impeachment because of his own role in Iran-Contra.

After having expressed antagonism towards nation-building during the 2000 campaign, newly elected President George W. Bush appointed Abrams as deputy national security adviser, where Abrams’ role was essentially nation builder-in-chief.

Abrams was even more consequential as nation-wrecker. He was one of the principal architects of the invasion of Iraq. He is an inveterate advocate of “regime change” against countries whose policies he doesn’t like. He has a track record in attempting to overthrow foreign governments both by covert action and outright military invasion. –American Greatness

Wednesday’s heated exchange followed a controversial week for Rep. Omar, who came under bipartisan fire for her criticism of Israeli money in US politics, which was widely interpreted as anti-Semitic.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

More evidence of Clinton election meddling, as calls for investigation grow louder (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 85.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the real case for Russia collusion before and during the 2016 US Presidential election, not against Donald Trump, but the Clinton’s and the Democrat Party.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Authored by John Solomon, via The Hill


With Republicans on both House and Senate investigative committees having found no evidence of Donald Trump being guilty of Democrat-inspired allegations of Russian collusion, it is worth revisiting one anecdote that escaped significant attention during the hysteria but continues to have U.S. security implications.

As secretary of State, Hillary Clinton worked with Russian leaders, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-President Dmitri Medvedev, to create U.S. technology partnerships with Moscow’s version of Silicon Valley, a sprawling high-tech campus known as Skolkovo.

Clinton’s handprint was everywhere on the 2009-2010 project, the tip of a diplomatic spear to reboot U.S.-Russian relations after years of hostility prompted by Vladimir Putin’s military action against the former Soviet republic and now U.S. ally Georgia.

A donor to the Clinton Foundation, Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, led the Russian side of the effort, and several American donors to the Clinton charity got involved. Clinton’s State Department facilitated U.S. companies working with the Russian project, and she personally invited Medvedev to visit Silicon Valley.

The collaboration occurred at the exact same time Bill Clinton made his now infamous trip to Russia to pick up a jaw-dropping $500,000 check for a single speech.

The former president’s trip secretly raised eyebrows inside his wife’s State Department, internal emails show.

That’s because he asked permission to meet Vekselberg, the head of Skolkovo, and Arkady Dvorkovich, a senior official of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear giant seeking State’s permission to buy Uranium One, a Canadian company with massive U.S. uranium reserves.

Years later, intelligence documents show, both the Skolkovo and Uranium One projects raised serious security concerns.

In 2013, the U.S. military’s leading intelligence think tank in Europe sounded alarm that the Skolkovo project might be a front for economic and military espionage.

“Skolkovo is an ambitious enterprise, aiming to promote technology transfer generally, by inbound direct investment, and occasionally, through selected acquisitions. As such, Skolkovo is arguably an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage — with the additional distinction that it can achieve such a transfer on a much larger scale and more efficiently,” EUCOM’s intelligence bulletin wrote in 2013.

“Implicit in Russia’s development of Skolkovo is a critical question — a question that Russia may be asking itself — why bother spying on foreign companies and government laboratories if they will voluntarily hand over all the expertise Russia seeks?”

A year later, the FBI went further and sent letters warning several U.S. technology companies that had become entangled with Skolkovo that they risked possible espionage. And an agent in the bureau’s Boston office wrote an extraordinary op-ed to publicize the alarm.

Skolkovo “may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” Assistant Special Agent in Charge Lucia Ziobro wrote in the Boston Business Journal.

The FBI had equal concern about Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One. An informer named William Douglas Campbell had gotten inside the Russian nuclear giant in 2009 and gathered evidence that Rosatom’s agents in the United States were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving kickbacks, extortion and bribery.

Campbell also obtained written evidence that Putin wanted to buy Uranium One as part of a strategy to obtain monopolistic domination of the global uranium markets, including leverage over the U.S.

Campbell also warned that a major in-kind donor to the Clinton Global Initiative was simultaneously working for Rosatom while the decision for U.S. approval was pending before Hillary Clinton’s department. Ultimately, her department and the Obama administration approved the transaction.

The evidence shows the Clintons financially benefited from Russia — personally and inside their charity — at the same time they were involved in U.S. government actions that rewarded Moscow and increased U.S. security risks.

The intersections between the Clintons, the Democrats and Russia carried into 2016, when a major political opposition research project designed to portray GOP rival Donald Trump as compromised by Moscow was launched by Clinton’s presidential campaign and brought to the FBI.

Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS research firm was secretly hired by the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party through their law firm, Perkins Coie.

Simpson then hired retired British intelligence operative Christopher Steele — whom the FBI learned was “desperate” to defeat Trump — to write an unverified dossier suggesting that Trump’s campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the election.

Simpson, Steele and Perkins Coie all walked Trump-Russia related allegations into the FBI the summer before the election, prompting agents who openly disliked Trump to launch a counterintelligence probe of the GOP nominee shortly before Election Day.

Simpson and Steele also went to the news media to air the allegations in what senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr would later write was a “Hail Mary” effort to influence the election.

Congressional investigators have painstakingly pieced together evidence that shows the Clinton research project had extensive contact with Russians.

Ohr’s notes show that Steele’s main source of uncorroborated allegationsagainst Trump came from an ex-Russian intelligence officer. “Much of the collection about the Trump campaign ties to Russia comes from a former Russian intelligence officer (? not entirely clear) who lives in the U.S.,” Ohr scribbled.

Steele’s dossier also relied on information from a Belarus-born Russian businessman, according to numerous reports and a book on the Russia scandal.

Steele and Simpson had Russian-tied business connections, too, while they formulated the dossier.

Steele worked for the lawyers for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and tried to leverage those connections to help the FBI get evidence from the Russian aluminum magnate against Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The effort resulted in FBI agents visiting Deripaska in fall 2016. Deripaska told the agents that no collusion existed.

Likewise, Simpson worked in 2016 for the Russian company Prevezon — which was trying to escape U.S. government penalties — and one of its Russian lawyers, Natalia Veselnitskaya. In sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Simpson admitted he dined with Veselnitskaya both the night before and the night after her infamous meeting with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower in June 2016.

Simpson insists the two dinners sandwiching one of the seminal events in the Trump collusion narrative had nothing to do with the Trump Tower meeting, a claim many Republicans distrust.

Whatever the case, there’s little doubt the main instigators of the Clinton-inspired allegations against Trump got information from Russians and were consorting with them during the political opposition project.

This past week, we learned from Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) that his committee came to the same conclusion as the House: There is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

But now there is growing evidence — of Democratic connections to Russia. It’s enough that former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) believes a probe should be opened.

There is “obvious collusion the Democrats had through Glenn Simpson and through Fusion GPS, that they were talking directly to Russia,” Nunes told Hill.TV’s “Rising” in an interview to be aired Monday.

Collusion can be criminal if it involves conspiracy to break federal laws, or it can involve perfectly legal, unwitting actions that still jeopardize America’s security against a “frenemy” like Russia.

There is clear evidence now that shows Hillary Clinton’s family and charity profited from Moscow and simultaneously facilitated official government actions benefiting Russia that have raised security concerns.

And there’s irrefutable evidence that her opposition research effort on Trump — one that inspired an FBI probe — was carried out by people who got information from Russia and were consorting with Russians.

It would seem those questions deserve at least some of the scrutiny afforded the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry that is now two-plus years old.


NOTE: This story has been updated from the original to correct that Uranium One is a Canadian company and to clarify that House and Senate investigating committees have cleared the president.

John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He is The Hill’s executive vice president for video

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Douma chemical weapons hoax exposed by BBC producer

Very frightening for us all is the coordination of propaganda between the States of US, Britain, France and Israel.

Richard Galustian

Published

on

It is beyond doubt that the White Helmets ‘staged’ the false flag operation at the Douma hospital that caused President Trump to attack Syria last April.

Days after the attack the much to be admired, yet still maligned by many, investigative reporter, Robert Fisk was on the ground in Douma and interviewed countless people, videoed the scene, made it public in the newspapers and by TV the fact of the fake sarin attack.

What happened next were attempts to rubbish Fisk’s story; a almost frightening Orwellian propaganda machine kicked in….and went into overdrive. That is to say a combination of ‘corrupt’ reporters; some just naive or dumb, many of whom had never been to Douma or even Syria, plus the full weight of the US, British and French Governments and finally, not forgetting, one of the greatest fraudsters of this century an absolute nobody, that calls himself Eliot Higgins and his ‘Bellycat Organisation’, all weighed in to accuse Fisk of lying.

Clearly not in order of importance but suffice to say Elliot Higgins, is now obviously ‘used’ as a convenient tool for Russia bashing by certain Western powers, but is a total fraud. Rather than write too much about this person, judge by reading an exposé that couldn’t be more revealing, uncovering his lie in the Daily Telegraph (link:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10730163/The-blogger-who-tracks-Syrian-rockets-from-his-sofa.html).

Not much more need be said about this con-man turned ‘G-Man’. However later in this piece, I will quote some of the Douma ridiculing propaganda of Higgins/Bellingcat, as it is too crass not to be reminded of the way our governments operate.

So based on a complete lie, President Trump ordered an attack on an Assad controlled area in Syria using several bombs including 66 Tomahawk cruise missiles and 19 JASSM-ER (fired from USAF fighters, air to surface standoff missiles). The price for all was around $200million. Much needed money wasted that belongs to the people of US in these austere times.

That by the way does not include the cost of the coordinated attack by the British and French of a total (together) of 17 stormshadow missiles dropped from fighters. Its worth mentioning that in a pathetic display of oneupmanship directed at the British, the French made a last minute decision to add a meagre three more missile types to their attack; ‘Missiles de Croisière Navals’.

As said earlier it is important to remember the Orwellian ‘anti-truth’ propaganda and instead of commenting on it, I’ll just quote what Higgins/Bellingcat said at the time. “The OPCW-FFM report on the February 4 2018 chemical attack in Saraqib, Idlib, reveals not only information about the Saraqib attack, but also the broader use of chemical weapons in Syria by Assad, and additional evidence to support the theory that Assad’s Syrian government forces were behind the April 7 2018 chemical attack in Douma, Damascus. Consistent with Bellingcat’s earlier investigation into the Saraqib chemical attack, the OPCW-FFM report establishes it was the same case in Douma.”

Nonsense.

This scandal of this and other fake White Helmets videos is developing as more details emerge daily, so expect more facts matched with more disinformation and lies from the US and UK.

What we have is first a copy of a twitter exchange which is self explanatory:

So as to be absolutely clear, on February 13th, BBC Syria’s Producer said he could “without a doubt” prove that the Douma hospital scene was false, a White Helmets (WH) fake event.

He said “the Douma Hospital scene was staged. No fatalities occurred in the hospital. All the WH, activists and people I spoke to are either in Idlib or Euphrates Shield areas.

Only one person was in Damascus.”

The evidence is seen above in the tweet at 05:33 – 13 February 2019, the BBC Producer wrote on his personal, verified Twitter account, which has since been made private or perhaps blocked by persons or governments unknown, anyway someone who controls Twitter.

So some sort of what clearly must have been a false flag attack did happen at Douma but it was like a film scene, staged, using as left over evidence, cylinders filled with say oxygen even chlorine, anything but poison gas and certainly not Sarin gas. The cylinders were left in tact, undamaged as if laid there on the site rather than dropped from thousands of feet from the sky – and who can prove Assad’s airforce dropped them? – and how come they remained undamaged when hitting the ground? – ridiculous; how stupid do our governments think we, the people, are.

“Everything around the attack was manufactured for maximum effect.”

Adding “I can tell you that Jaysh al-Islam ruled Douma with an iron fist. They co-opted activists, doctors and humanitarians with fear and intimidation.”

In fact, one of the 4 people filming the scene was Dr. Abu Bakr Hanan, whom the BBC Producer described as a “brute and shifty” doctor affiliated with Jaysh Al-Islam. The Producer further stating that the narrative should be that “there weren’t enough doctors”. That said, there was one even (seen and filmed) filming and not taking part in the rescue efforts.” A joke!

Why, we must all ask, has no major newspaper or TV any large media outlet in US, UK or France headlined or even mentioned these new facts, that Douma was a lie, that it was staged?

On 9 February, James Harkin, published in ‘The Intercept’ an article where Harkin speaks about Jaysh al-Islam’s rule in Douma, among others. His article ends with “What government pummels its citizens with bombs and chlorine to get them to pressure rebels to leave their city? At the same time, Jaish Al-Islam was sending volleys of improvised rockets into Damascus and snatching activists and members of religious minorities for ransom or to be disappeared. It’s between these two violent truths that the real story of the Syrian conflict begins to emerge not in a bewildering collage of images sent from a war zone, designed to terrify and outrage.”

To conclude, the BBC Producer was so disgusted at pro-rebel activists and rebels’ conduct and the seeming complicity of Western officials, he decide to speak out.

As far as the Russian government is concerned, they now are counter accusing the British government of ordering the White Helmets to fake a chemical attack to help persuade President Trump to unleash cruise missiles. The Russian response was to an allegation by the British government that the “demonisation” of the (thoroughly already discredited) White Helmets comes from the Russian government itself.

Which version do you believe?

Very frightening for us all is the coordination of propaganda between the States of US, Britain, France and Israel.

ALL these wars must stop.

I am neither pro-nor against Russia, but it is very clear to anyone that these wars and attempts at regime changing is a US/British/Israeli idea.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending