Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Boko Haram, proof yet again as to how expendable men are

Men are indeed disposable. Boko Haram changed its tactics, from murdering young schoolboys to kidnapping school girls. The kidnapping event attracted main stream media attention and U.S. military action, succeeding where the murdering of young men failed.

Published

on

0 Views

The Boko Haram has finally caught the attention of the western world. Main stream media, Hollywood, and the POTUS himself are now paying attention to the radical, “western education is a sin”, militant group in Africa.

What did Boko Haram do to attract such attention, including the First Lady’s hashtag photo op? They kidnapped 200 Nigerian schoolgirls. This is without a doubt a disgusting and terrible event that has rightly been met with horror worldwide, while concurrently prompting U.S. military action.

The kidnapping, as terrible as it appears, is not an isolated incident. Actually Boko Haram has a history of unspeakable violence targeted at young children. Their is however one main difference between what has recently happened with the schoolgirl kidnapping and the past events that frightfully went unnoticed and rarely reported.

Can you spot the difference in tactics used by the Boko Haram that finally has Obama and Co. up in arms:

February 25, 2014: Boko Haram set fire to a locked dormitory at a school in northern Nigeria, then shot and slit the throats of students who tried to escape through windows during a pre-dawn attack Tuesday. At least 58 students were killed, including many who were burned alive. Boys who managed to escape, according to witnesses, had their throats slit or were gunned down as they ran. The victims are believed to be between the ages of 15-20. Female students were spared in the attack.

September 29 2013: Gunmen from Boko Haram entered the male dormitory in the College of Agriculture in Gujba, Yobe State, Nigeria, killing forty-four students and teachers. Boko Haram entered the college at 1 a.m. local time and opened fire on the students while they were asleep. Only the male sleeping quarters were targeted.

Men (and in this case innocent schoolboys) are proven to be expendable. It is a sad truth that all men must come to grips with. In today’s liberal marxist world, men are tools (in a utilitarian sense) and considered to be the disposable sex.

After much trial and error, Boko Haram figured this unfortunate truth out. They learned that the only way to attract international, main stream media attention for their cause, was to change their target. Shift from murdering young boys en masse to kidnapping young girls with the possibility of selling them into sexual slavery.

As is stated via policymic.com:

The most recent kidnapping of the school girls in Chibok is a tragedy, but it’s also a tactical move by the group.

Boko Haram wants to instil fear in the populace, demonstrate that the government can no longer protect Nigerians and make the government look incapable before the people…

Bring-Back-Our-Girls-Michelle-Obama

Hey Michelle…how about a #bringbackourboys hashtag.

References:

http://www.policymic.com/articles/89069/everything-you-need-to-know-about-boko-haram-the-group-kidnapping-nigerian-girls

http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/progressive-boko-haram-massacring-schoolboys-is-permissible-kidnapping-schoolgirls-is-a-human-rights-abuse-nigeria/

http://thedialoguechronicle.com/boko-haram-terrorist-attack-leaves-29-schoolboys-nigeria-dead/

http://time.com/108025/nigeria-chad-boko-haram-american-troops-obama/

http://thedialoguechronicle.com/boko-haram-terrorist-attack-leaves-29-schoolboys-nigeria-dead/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
46 Comments

46
Leave a Reply

avatar
46 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback

The Absent Game

Between me and my husband we have owned much more MP3 players over the years than I can count, together with Sansas, iRivers, iPods (basic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few a long time I’ve settled down to one line of gamers.

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Fantastic Morning, I just stopped in to go to your web site and thought I would say I loved myself.

trackback

The Silent Shard

This can almost certainly be quite valuable for some within your positions I intend to will not only with my blogging site but

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Excellent Morning, I just stopped in to go to your website and believed I would say I loved myself.

trackback

The Silent Shard

This could probably be rather valuable for many of one’s positions I intend to never only with my weblog but

trackback

The Slave of the Husband

Seeking forward to studying added from you afterward!…

trackback

Thorn of Girl

Great data may be observed on this world wide web blog site.

trackback

The Ships’s Voyages

I believe technologies just makes it even worse. Now there’s a channel to under no circumstances treatment, now there would not be considered a chance for them to find out.

trackback

The Slave of the Husband

Looking for forward to studying excess from you afterward!…

trackback

The Absent Game

Involving me and my husband we have owned far more MP3 gamers through the years than I can count, which includes Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few decades I’ve settled down to one line of gamers.

trackback

The Birch of the Shadow

I believe there may possibly be a number of duplicates, but an exceedingly handy listing! I’ve tweeted this. Many thanks for sharing!

trackback

The Silent Shard

This will likely be rather useful for some of one’s positions I intend to you should not only with my blog site but

trackback

The Absent Game

Among me and my husband we have owned additional MP3 gamers over the years than I can count, together with Sansas, iRivers, iPods (basic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few decades I’ve settled down to one line of players.

trackback

The Birch of the Shadow

I think there may be a couple of duplicates, but an exceedingly helpful record! I have tweeted this. Many thanks for sharing!

trackback

The Slave of the Husband

Trying to find in advance to learning further from you afterward!…

trackback

The Ships’s Voyages

I feel technological know-how just causes it to be even worse. Now there’s a channel to under no circumstances care, now there would not become a probability for them to find out.

trackback

Thorn of Girl

Great info can be uncovered on this web blog site.

trackback

Healing’s Dragon

to locate problems to further improve my site!I suppose its ok to create usage of a couple of of the principles!!

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Fantastic Morning, I just stopped in to visit your website and assumed I’d say I appreciated myself.

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Fantastic Early morning, I just stopped in to visit your web site and believed I’d say I enjoyed myself.

trackback

Whispering Misty

So sorry you can expect to skip the workshop!

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Great Morning, I just stopped in to visit your site and assumed I’d say I appreciated myself.

trackback

The Birch of the Shadow

I think there may possibly be a couple duplicates, but an exceedingly helpful record! I’ve tweeted this. Numerous thanks for sharing!

trackback

Whispering Misty

So sorry you can skip the workshop!

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 28524 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Superior Morning, I just stopped in to visit your website and believed I would say I experienced myself.

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

The Birch of the Shadow

I feel there may be a couple duplicates, but an exceedingly handy record! I have tweeted this. Several thanks for sharing!

trackback

Whispering Misty

So sorry you’ll miss the workshop!

trackback

The Absent Game

Between me and my husband we have owned far more MP3 players over the years than I can count, together with Sansas, iRivers, iPods (traditional & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few ages I’ve settled down to one line of players.

trackback

Woman of Alien

Best do the job you’ve done, this web site is actually interesting with superb facts. Time is God’s technique for preserving every little thing from going on directly.

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 60418 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 81414 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 86413 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 38831 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/boko-haram-proof-yet-expendable-men/ […]

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]Here is an excellent Blog You might Find Intriguing that we Encourage You[…]

trackback

3nvb54wnxd5cbvbecnv5ev75bc

[…]Here is a good Weblog You may Come across Exciting that we Encourage You[…]

trackback

Title

[…]we like to honor several other world wide web websites on the net, even though they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages worth checking out[…]

trackback

Title

[…]the time to study or take a look at the content or web-sites we’ve linked to below the[…]

trackback

Title

[…]very couple of internet websites that happen to be in depth below, from our point of view are undoubtedly very well really worth checking out[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are a lot of totally not associated web sites to ours, even so, they’re certainly worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

trackback

Title

[…]please stop by the internet sites we adhere to, such as this a single, as it represents our picks through the web[…]

Latest

Google Manipulated YouTube Search Results for Abortion, Maxine Waters, David Hogg

The existence of the blacklist was revealed in an internal Google discussion thread leaked to Breitbart News.

The Duran

Published

on

Via Breitbart


In sworn testimony, Google CEO Sundar Pichai told Congress last month that his company does not “manually intervene” on any particular search result. Yet an internal discussion thread leaked to Breitbart News reveals Google regularly intervenes in search results on its YouTube video platform – including a recent intervention that pushed pro-life videos out of the top ten search results for “abortion.”

The term “abortion” was added to a “blacklist” file for “controversial YouTube queries,” which contains a list of search terms that the company considers sensitive. According to the leak, these include some of these search terms related to: abortion, abortions, the Irish abortion referendum, Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters, and anti-gun activist David Hogg.

The existence of the blacklist was revealed in an internal Google discussion thread leaked to Breitbart News by a source inside the company who wishes to remain anonymous. A partial list of blacklisted terms was also leaked to Breitbart by another Google source.

In the leaked discussion thread, a Google site reliability engineer hinted at the existence of more search blacklists, according to the source.

“We have tons of white- and blacklists that humans manually curate,” said the employee. “Hopefully this isn’t surprising or particularly controversial.”

Others were more concerned about the presence of the blacklist. According to the source, the software engineer who started the discussion called the manipulation of search results related to abortion a “smoking gun.”

The software engineer noted that the change had occurred following an inquiry from a left-wing Slate journalist about the prominence of pro-life videos on YouTube, and that pro-life videos were replaced with pro-abortion videos in the top ten results for the search terms following Google’s manual intervention.

“The Slate writer said she had complained last Friday and then saw different search results before YouTube responded to her on Monday,” wrote the employee. “And lo and behold, the [changelog] was submitted on Friday, December 14 at 3:17 PM.”

The manually downranked items included several videos from Dr. Antony Levatino, a former abortion doctor who is now a pro-life activist. Another video in the top ten featured a woman’s personal story of being pressured to have an abortion, while another featured pro-life conservative Ben Shapiro. The Slate journalist who complained to Google reported that these videos previously featured in the top ten, describing them in her story as “dangerous misinformation.”

Since the Slate journalist’s inquiry and Google’s subsequent intervention, the top search results now feature pro-abortion content from left-wing sources like BuzzFeed, Vice, CNN, and Last Week Tonight With John Oliver. In her report, the Slate journalist acknowledged that the search results changed shortly after she contacted Google.

The manual adjustment of search results by a Google-owned platform contradicts a key claim made under oath by Google CEO Sundar Pichai in his congressional testimony earlier this month: that his company does not “manually intervene on any search result.”

A Google employee in the discussion thread drew attention to Pichai’s claim, noting that it “seems like we are pretty eager to cater our search results to the social and political agenda of left-wing journalists.”

One of the posts in the discussion also noted that the blacklist had previously been edited to include the search term “Maxine Waters” after a single Google employee complained the top YouTube search result for Maxine Waters was “very low quality.”

Google’s alleged intervention on behalf of a Democratic congresswoman would be further evidence of the tech giant using its resources to prop up the left. Breitbart News previously reported on leaked emails revealing the company targeted pro-Democrat demographics in its get-out-the-vote efforts in 2016.

According to the source, a software engineer in the thread also noted that “a bunch of terms related to the abortion referendum in Ireland” had been added to the blacklist – another change with potentially dramatic consequences on the national policies of a western democracy.

youtube_controversial_query_blacklist

At least one post in the discussion thread revealed the existence of a file called “youtube_controversial_query_blacklist,” which contains a list of YouTube search terms that Google manually curates. In addition to the terms “abortion,” “abortions,” “Maxine Waters,” and search terms related to the Irish abortion referendum, a Google software engineer noted that the blacklist includes search terms related to terrorist attacks. (the posts specifically mentions that the “Strasbourg terrorist attack” as being on the list).

“If you look at the other entries recently added to the youtube_controversial_query_blacklist(e.g., entries related to the Strasbourg terrorist attack), the addition of abortion seems…out-of-place,” wrote the software engineer, according to the source.

After learning of the existence of the blacklist, Breitbart News obtained a partial screenshot of the full blacklist file from a source within Google. It reveals that the blacklist includes search terms related to both mass shootings and the progressive anti-second amendment activist David Hogg.

This suggests Google has followed the lead of Democrat politicians, who have repeatedly pushed tech companies to censor content related to the Parkland school shooting and the Parkland anti-gun activists. It’s part of a popular new line of thought in the political-media establishment, which views the public as too stupid to question conspiracy theories for themselves.

Here is the partial blacklist leaked to Breitbart:

2117 plane crash Russian

2118 plane crash

2119 an-148

2120 florida shooting conspiracy

2121 florida shooting crisis actors

2122 florida conspiracy

2123 florida false flag shooting

2124 florida false flag

2125 fake florida school shooting

2126 david hogg hoax

2127 david hogg fake

2128 david hogg crisis actor

2129 david hogg forgets lines

2130 david hogg forgets his lines

2131 david hogg cant remember his lines

2132 david hogg actor

2133 david hogg cant remember

2134 david hogg conspiracy

2135 david hogg exposed

2136 david hogg lines

2137 david hogg rehearsing

2120 florida shooting conspiracy

The full internal filepath of the blacklist, according to another source, is:

//depot/google3/googledata/superroot/youtube/youtube_controversial_query_blacklist

Contradictions

Responding to a request for comment, a YouTube spokeswoman said the company wants to promote “authoritative” sources in its search results, but maintained that YouTube is a “platform for free speech” that “allow[s]” both pro-life and pro-abortion content.

YouTube’s full comment:

YouTube is a platform for free speech where anyone can choose to post videos, as long as they follow our Community Guidelines, which prohibit things like inciting violence and pornography. We apply these policies impartially and we allow both pro-life and pro-choice opinions. Over the last year we’ve described how we are working to better surface news sources across our site for news-related searches and topical information. We’ve improved our search and discovery algorithms, built new features that clearly label and prominently surface news sources on our homepage and search pages, and introduced information panels to help give users more authoritative sources where they can fact check information for themselves.

In the case of the “abortion” search results, YouTube’s intervention to insert “authoritative” content resulted in the downranking of pro-life videos and the elevation of pro-abortion ones.

A Google spokesperson took a tougher line than its YouTube subsidiary, stating that “Google has never manipulated or modified the search results or content in any of its products to promote a particular political ideology.”

However, in the leaked discussion thread, a member of Google’s “trust & safety” team, Daniel Aaronson, admitted that the company maintains “huge teams” that work to adjust search results for subjects that are “prone to hyperbolic content, misleading information, and offensive content” – all subjective terms that are frequently used to suppress right-leaning sources.

He also admitted that the interventions weren’t confined to YouTube – they included search results delivered via Google Assistant, Google Home, and in rare cases Google ’s organic search results.

In the thread, Aaronson attempted to explain how search blacklisting worked. He claimed that highly specific searches would generate non-blacklisted results, even controversial ones. But the inclusion of highly specific terms in the YouTube blacklist, like “David Hogg cant remember his lines” – the name of an actual viral video – seems to contradict this.

Aaronson’s full post is copied below:

I work in Trust and Safety and while I have no particular input as to exactly what’s happening for YT I can try to explain why you’d have this kind of list and why people are finding lists like these on Code Search.

When dealing with abuse/controversial content on various mediums you have several levers to deal with problems. Two prominent levers are “Proactive” and “Reactive”:

  • Proactive: Usually refers to some type of algorithm/scalable solution to a general problem
    • E.g.: We don’t allow straight up porn on YouTube so we create a classifier that detects porn and automatically remove or flag for review the videos the porn classifier is most certain of
  • Reactive: Usually refers to a manual fix to something that has been brought to our attention that our proactive solutions don’t/didn’t work on and something that is clearly in the realm of bad enough to warrant a quick targeted solution (determined by pages and pages of policies worked on over many years and many teams to be fair and cover necessary scope)
    • E,g.: A website that used to be a good blog had it’s domain expire and was purchased/repurposed to spam Search results with autogenerated pages full of gibberish text, scraped images, and links to boost traffic to other spammy sites. It is manually actioned for violating policy

These Organic Search policies and the consequences to violating them are public

Manually reacting to things is not very scalable, and is not an ideal solution to most problems, so the proactive lever is really the one we all like to lean on. Ideally, our classifiers/algorithm are good at providing useful and rich results to our users while ignoring things at are not useful or not relevant. But we all know, this isn’t exactly the case all the time (especially on YouTube).

From a user perspective, there are subjects that are prone to hyperbolic content, misleading information, and offensive content. Now, these words are highly subjective and no one denies that. But we can all agree generally, lines exist in many cultures about what is clearly okay vs. what is not okay. E.g. a video of a puppy playing with a toy is probably okay in almost every culture or context, even if it’s not relevant to the query. But a video of someone committing suicide and begging others to follow in his/her footsteps is probably on the other side of the line for many folks.

While my second example is technically relevant to the generic query of “suicide”, that doesn’t mean that this is a very useful or good video to promote on the top of results for that query. So imagine a classifier that says, for any queries on a particular text file, let’s pull videos using signals that we historically understand to be strong indicators of quality (I won’t go into specifics here, but those signals do exist). We’re not manually curating these results, we’re just saying “hey, be extra careful with results for this query because many times really bad stuff can appear and lead to a bad experience for most users”. Ideally the proactive lever did this for us, but in extreme cases where we need to act quickly on something that is so obviously not okay, the reactive/manual approach is sometimes necessary. And also keep in mind, that this is different for every product. The bar for changing classifiers or manual actions on span in organic search is extremely high. However, the bar for things we let our Google Assistant say out loud might be a lot lower. If I search for “Jews run the banks” – I’ll likely find anti-semitic stuff in organic search. As a Jew, I might find some of these results offensive, but they are there for people to research and view, and I understand that this is not a reflection of Google feels about this issue. But if I ask Google assistant “Why do Jews run the banks” we wouldn’t be similarly accepting if it repeated and promoted conspiracy theories that likely pop up in organic search in her smoothing voice.

Whether we agree or not, user perception of our responses, results, and answers of different products and mediums can change. And I think many people are used to the fact that organic search is a place where content should be accessible no matter how offensive it might be, however, the expectation is very different on a Google Home, a Knowledge Panel, or even YouTube.

These lines are very difficult and can be very blurry, we are all well aware of this. So we’ve got huge teams that stay cognizant of these facts when we’re crafting policies considering classifier changes, or reacting with manual actions – these decisions are not made in a vacuum, but admittedly are also not made in a highly public forum like TGIF or IndustryInfo (as you can imagine, decisions/agreement would be hard to get in such a wide list – image if all your CL’s were reviewed by every engineer across Google all the time). I hope that answers some questions and gives a better layer of transparency without going into details about our “Pepsi formula”.

Best,

Daniel

The fact that Google manually curates politically contentious search results fits in with a wider pattern of political activity on the part of the tech giant.

In 2018, Breitbart News exclusively published a leaked video from the company that showed senior management in dismay at Trump’s election victory, and pledging to use the company’s power to make his populist movement a “hiccup” in history.

Breitbart also leaked “The Good Censor,” an internal research document from Google that admits the tech giant is engaged in the censorship of its own products, partly in response to political events.

Another leak revealed that employees within the company, including Google’s current director of Trust and Safety, tried to kick Breitbart News off Google’s market-dominating online ad platforms.

Yet another showed Google engaged in targeted turnout operations aimed to boost voter participation in pro-Democrat demographics in “key states” ahead of the 2016 election. The effort was dubbed a “silent donation” by a top Google employee.

Evidence for Google’s partisan activities is now overwhelming. President Trump has previously warned Google, as well as other Silicon Valley giants, not to engage in censorship or partisan activities. Google continues to defy him.

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. You can follow him on TwitterGab.ai and add him on Facebook. Email tips and suggestions to [email protected].

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Are You Suffering From Toxic Masculinity? Know The Warning Signs

Are you or a loved one suffering from toxic masculinity? Know the warning signs so you can seek help.

The Duran

Published

on

Via BabylonBee.com:


More than 40% of men today suffer from it—and their loved ones pay the price.

It’s called “toxic masculinity,” and it’s the latest disease to plague the nation. It can affect every aspect of a toxic man’s life. Worst of all, toxic masculinity is contagious, so if you’re infected, you need to know right away so you can avoid spreading it to your friends and family.

Are you or a loved one suffering from toxic masculinity? Know the warning signs so you can seek help:

  • Even the faintest whisper of facial hair – If you have a mustache, schedule a check-up. If you find a goatee on your face, consider going into the emergency room. If you have a full-grown beard, well, it’s probably too late for you.
  • A belief that men and women are at least a little bit different – Should you be infected with the cancerous idea that men and women are even the slightest bit different from one another, you could have toxic masculinity. If you’re a woman who believes this, then you suffer from an even worse disease called internalized misogyny.
  • Throwing a professional wrestler off a steel cage right through the announcer’s table – Men who suddenly look around and find that they’re tossing a professional wrestler off a steel cage to plummet right through the announcer’s table are at high risk of developing toxic masculinity. If a man in your life is suffering from this symptom, encourage him to stop wrestling in the WWE immediately.
  • Eating meat on occasion – A disease like toxic masculinity can quickly change your diet. If you find yourself leaving your vegan avocado quinoa toast smoothies untouched in favor of wolfing down some bacon-wrapped bacon, you might have toxic masculinity.
  • Holding the door open for a woman once in a while – It looks innocent enough: a woman approaches, and you hold the door so she doesn’t have to open it again. Seems like common courtesy, right? WRONG. It’s one of the first warning signs of toxic masculinity, and you need to do better if you’re going to beat this thing. One way to reduce your toxic masculinity is to slam the door right in a woman’s face and scream, “EQUALITY!!!” through the glass when she glares at you.
  • Yelling stuff about freedom and charging into battle wearing blue face paint – If you find yourself charging into battle against the English wearing blue face paint in the 14th century, you might be beyond medical help. Do all of society a favor and get yourself drawn and quartered so no one else catches this contagious illness.
  • Being a man who doesn’t hate himself – This is the most telling sign. If you’re a biological male and you don’t hate yourself, toxic masculinity is already coursing through your veins. If there’s going to be any hope of recovery, you need to begin hating yourself today.

If you or your man are showing one or more of these symptoms, contact your medical professional today. Get help, before it’s too late.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

AG Nominee Barr May Swing Anti-Trust Hammer At Amazon, Facebook And Google

Barr responded that he is interested in “reassessing” Justice Department antitrust policies when it comes to tech giants.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


President Trump’s nominee for Attorney General, William Barr, signaled during his confirmation hearing on Tuesday that he may put the screws to tech monopolies.

When asked by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) whether he thought antitrust laws were there “to protect consumers,” Barr responded that he is interested in “reassessing” Justice Department antitrust policies when it comes to tech giants.

“Yes, I mean generally that’s where I stand that is the purpose of anti-trust law obviously is to protect competition and competition ultimately that rebounds to consumer benefits. At the same time, I’m sort of interested in stepping back and reassessing or learning more about how the anti-trust division has been functioning and what their priorities are. I don’t think big is necessarily bad, but I think a lot of people wonder how such huge behemoths that now exist in Silicon Valley have taken shape under the nose of anti-trust enforcers.

When asked by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) about the DOJ’s role in terms of working with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to tackle anti-competitive behavior, Barr said: “I would like to weigh in to some of these issues.”

“I’d like to have the antitrust [division] support that effort to get more involved in reviewing the situation from a competition standpoint. I also am interested in the issue of privacy. And the question of who owns this data. And, you know, it’s not an area that I’ve studied closely or become an expert in. But I think it’s important for the department to get more involved in these questions.”

Tech giants Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Facebook and Apple are five of the six most valuable companies in the world, reports CNBC, adding that lawmakers have called for greater regulation of the industry “as privacy and platform manipulation scandals have rankled Silicon Valley.”

Barr acknowledged he still doesn’t have the solutions to these questions, including about whether the Justice Department has the authority to address alleged bias on online platforms. He said he’d “have to think long and hard before I said that it was really the stuff of an antitrust matter.” But he also expressed concern over the “network effects” that have allowed tech companies to become “so powerful that particular sectors could essentially be subsumed into these networks.”

Whoever is confirmed as attorney general could play a key role in shaping the enforcement of antitrust regulation in the coming years. –CNBC

Barr is no stranger to antitrust issues – having recently battled the DOJ over the proposed AT&T / Time Warner merger. As a then-member of the Time Warner board, Barr filed an affidavit opposing the “inexplicable” opposition by the DOJ’s leadership in light of President Trump’s “prior public animus towards CNN and this merger,” reported the Washington Post in December.

The AG nominee says that if confirmed he will recuse himself from the AT&T – Time Warner case after a lower court approved the merger in June, only to have the DOJ file an appeal in July.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending